10 June 2009

New Site

Attention: A new site dedicated to Deep Madderian pursuits is now in its nascent stage, though developing rapidly like a lion cub. We are thus quickly approaching a time when, to stay abreast of Deep Madder happenings, one may simply visit deepmadder.com.

Labels: ,


Blogger Caroline said...

when? will you link to it from isle of bile? can i make the link if you don't?

June 11, 2009 at 11:39 PM  
Blogger Alexander said...

What do you mean, "when"? What do you think of the site so far in its infancy?

June 12, 2009 at 1:30 AM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

why did you do this?

June 12, 2009 at 11:48 AM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

nm. now i understand

June 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

suggestion. make the title 'New Site" a hyperlink to the actual new site. because that confued me at first.. i thought it was a new blogspot you were starting up because i clicked that first.

June 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

for that madder, make the picture a hyperlink too. jeezewhiz

June 12, 2009 at 11:51 AM  
Blogger Alexander said...

what? why can't you just read the text until the end and thus discover the link thither? I don't understand.

Fine, I'll make the photograph a second link, as you wish. And are you back yet? Why won't anyone e-mail me?

June 12, 2009 at 1:48 PM  
Blogger Christopher said...

I just made all of them links a second ago, Alexander. Like, literal seconds ago.

June 12, 2009 at 1:48 PM  
Blogger Alexander said...

Wait a minute, there are actually now a total of THREE links to said site. At the beginning where it says "new site," at the end with "deepmadder.com," and now the photograph.

June 12, 2009 at 1:49 PM  
Blogger Christopher said...

Yeah, better too much than too little. I think Lindsay's point was valid - the link should've been included more often than just the final word. So the picture and the 'new site' mention were both logical places to include it.

June 12, 2009 at 2:10 PM  
Blogger Alexander said...

No, three times is ridiculously superfluous. Especially having two links in the text. If I didn't know better, I'd assume that two links in the same paragraph link to different things, because that's how it always is. Plus, again, why can't one just read to the end of the post? It's really not that long..

June 12, 2009 at 6:41 PM  
Blogger deepmadder said...

Ta da!

-Pamela (in Alexander's account)

June 12, 2009 at 8:18 PM  
Blogger Sir Jordan said...

I believe this to be the only rational "next step" for deep madder, but perhaps that madders not.

June 14, 2009 at 7:02 AM  
Blogger ZiCheng said...

Three links?! My intelligence have never suffered greater insult.

June 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM  
Blogger ZiCheng said...

Wait, it should be 'has' right?

June 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM  
Blogger Alexander said...

Yes, it should be "has."

June 28, 2009 at 6:37 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home