06 June 2009

Looking at the Internet

17 Comments:

Blogger tutankhamun said...

& then what happened??

June 10, 2009 at 1:06 AM  
Blogger tutankhamun said...

also, http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/141802?size=medium

June 10, 2009 at 1:20 AM  
Blogger Alexander said...

Ha, why are the geeks, dweebs, and weirdos basically members of the Sex Pistols?

June 10, 2009 at 3:00 PM  
Blogger tutankhamun said...

dunno if you seen this, worth checking out. (your questions are better) http://interviewproject.davidlynch.com/

June 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM  
Blogger Alexander said...

Okay I watched that. I liked it; thank you.

June 12, 2009 at 7:30 PM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

i watched it too and liked it but why is it only old down-n-out white guys being interviewed? I loved the farmer who never had a dream in life. he was solid. I realized after watching the intros that i had never seen lynch before.

June 14, 2009 at 8:48 AM  
Blogger ZiCheng said...

So when is "Taking a Shower" starring CN Hubbarde AND Alexander R. Arvelo-McQuaig slated to hit Vimeo?

June 19, 2009 at 1:10 AM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

and let me know when "Playing Grand Theft Auto" is being released

June 22, 2009 at 12:34 AM  
Blogger Alexander said...

Okay, weird undercutting comments aside, what did everyone think of my/our first film?

June 23, 2009 at 2:13 PM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

my favourite part was the writing at the beginning. good penmanship.

June 24, 2009 at 3:43 AM  
Blogger ZiCheng said...

I was going to make another undercutting comment, but since you prompted, I will give you my actual thoughts. I also enjoyed the opening credits, a lot, but I didn't much enjoy the actual film. The directing aspect was good, I liked the various shots of the actor looking at the Internet. The acting was good too. But I don't see the point of making a film without a narrative. Incidentally, I think you should hire me to write your next film.

June 24, 2009 at 8:57 AM  
Blogger Alexander said...

This film I think has proven to be the most hated thing I've ever been involved with. What kind of narrative do you expect in a film that is one and a half minutes long? None, exactly. And why does no one appreciate awkward humour? I should've omitted the credits at the beginning so people wouldn't focus on that. I don't know, I'm obviously biased, but I'm pretty sure that I would enjoy this even if I wasn't the one who made it. I literally don't get what's so terrible about this.

June 25, 2009 at 8:19 PM  
Blogger ZiCheng said...

I don't think anyone hates it, but most people are a bit confused by it. I'm even more confused now that you said that it was intended to be humouous. In addition, I don't see how it is the least bit awkward since Christopher is alone, and seemingly perfectly at ease. You should accept people's compliments, I believe they are genuine and even helpful. And my last point is that a lot can happen in under 2 minutes. Take those stop-motion short films Julia showed us, for example.

June 27, 2009 at 7:11 AM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

June 30, 2009 at 1:44 PM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

"THE camera work WAS hinting at"

June 30, 2009 at 1:45 PM  
Blogger ZiCheng said...

So it was supposed to be banal? But Christopher looked like he was enjoying himself. I'm not joking, he didn't look the least bit dissatisfied.

June 30, 2009 at 3:30 PM  
Blogger Lindsay said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

June 30, 2009 at 7:54 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home